Fiat Doblo cargo
Reliability, running costs, and MOT data across 11 years from 4,699 real MOT tests.
Avg Pass Rate
69%
Total Tests
4,699
Best Year
2013 (90%)
Years Covered
11
About the Fiat Doblo cargo
The Fiat Doblo cargo has been tested 4,699 times in 2026 MOT data across 11 model years (2003 to 2013), with an average pass rate of 69%. That's 13 points below the national average of 82%, so check the year-by-year data carefully before buying. Available as diesel and petrol.
Best and Worst Years
The 2013 model is the most reliable with a 90% pass rate from 216 tests. The 2003 model has the lowest at 58%. With a 32 point spread, choosing the right year makes a big difference to reliability.
Reliability Trend
Newer FIAT DOBLO CARGOs show better MOT pass rates than older ones, with an average improvement of 9 percentage points.
Mileage Across Years
The oldest model in our data (2003) averages 131,040 miles, while the newest (2013) averages 65,648 miles. Older models have covered serious mileage, so suspension and drivetrain wear are worth checking.
Compared to the Fiat brand average of 83%, the Doblo cargo is 14 points lower, placing it among the less reliable Fiat models.
Estimated Running Costs
Based on 7,400 miles/year, current fuel prices, and MOT pass rate data. Insurance not included.
Full 2013 detailsHow reliable is the Fiat Doblo cargo?
Fiat Doblo cargo by Year
Click any year to see detailed running costs, reliability data, and comparisons with similar cars.
Fiat Doblo cargo Guides & Articles
Cheapest Cars to Insure in the UK: Insurance Groups 1-10
9 min read
ComparisonPetrol vs Diesel in 2026: Which Actually Costs Less to Own?
8 min read
Reliability20 Most Reliable Used Cars UK 2026: Real MOT Pass Rate Rankings
10 min read
Buying GuideFord Fiesta Common Problems (2026): What to Check Before Buying
13 min read
ReliabilityFord Puma Problems: 7 Issues Owners Report (2026)
13 min read
Checking a specific Fiat Doblo cargo?
Enter the reg plate to see its individual MOT history, mileage verification, and predicted costs.