Volvo XC70 MOT Pass Rates and Running Costs by Year
Reliability, estimated running costs, and MOT data across 16 model years from 32,082 MOT tests in 2024.
Avg Pass Rate
79%
Total Tests
32,082
Highest Pass Rate
2015 (85%)
Years Covered
16
About the Volvo XC70
The Volvo XC70 was MOT tested 32,082 times in 2024 (DVSA data, retests included) across 16 model years (2002 to 2017), with an average pass rate of 79%. That's close to the average of 82% across all models in our data. Our records list diesel and petrol versions.
Best and Worst Years
Of the years with at least 100 tests, the 2015 model has the highest pass rate at 85% from 2,845 tests. The 2004 model has the lowest at 70%. The 15 point gap means pass rates vary somewhat between years, but no year is dramatically different. Newer cars usually pass more often simply because they are younger.
Reliability Trend
Newer Volvo XC70s pass their MOT more often than older ones, by 9 percentage points on average, which is mostly down to age and wear.
Mileage Across Years
The oldest model in our data (2002) averages 162,305 miles, while the newest (2017) averages 123,691 miles. Older models have covered serious mileage, so suspension and drivetrain wear are worth checking.
Compared to the Volvo brand average of 87%, the XC70 is 8 points lower, placing it among the less reliable Volvo models.
What the Volvo XC70 fails its MOT on most
Of 5,099 MOT tests on the Volvo XC70 that failed at the first attempt in 2025 (DVSA data), the share that failed on each area:
43%
Lights and electrics
Same age: 44%
38%
Suspension
Same age: 38%
24%
Brakes
Same age: 25%
Estimated Running Costs
Based on 7,400 miles/year, average pump prices of 174.57p petrol and 199.33p diesel (GOV.UK weekly road fuel prices, week of 19 October 2026), and MOT pass rate data. Insurance not included.
Full 2017 detailsHow reliable is the Volvo XC70?
Volvo XC70 by Year
Click any year to see detailed running costs, reliability data, and comparisons with similar cars.
| Year | Pass Rate | Tests | Avg Mileage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 90% | 62 | 123,691 mi | |
| 2016 | 84% | 1,794 | 79,842 mi | |
| 2015 | 85% | 2,845 | 87,969 mi | |
| 2014 | 84% | 3,072 | 97,630 mi | |
| 2013 | 83% | 2,633 | 107,901 mi | |
| 2012 | 81% | 2,395 | 118,040 mi | |
| 2011 | 82% | 3,270 | 126,546 mi | |
| 2010 | 81% | 2,492 | 137,819 mi | |
| 2009 | 83% | 1,875 | 138,262 mi | |
| 2008 | 80% | 1,928 | 143,047 mi | |
| 2007 | 76% | 2,498 | 146,942 mi | |
| 2006 | 74% | 2,205 | 150,106 mi | |
| 2005 | 72% | 2,423 | 162,690 mi | |
| 2004 | 70% | 1,473 | 164,302 mi | |
| 2003 | 72% | 932 | 168,515 mi | |
| 2002 | 74% | 185 | 162,305 mi |
Questions about the Volvo XC70
Is the Volvo XC70 reliable?
Across its 16 model years in our data (2002 to 2017), the Volvo XC70 averages a 79% MOT pass rate, from 32,082 tests (DVSA MOT data for tests in 2024, retests included). That's 3 points below the average of 82% across all models in the same data. The 2015 model has the highest pass rate of the years with at least 100 tests, at 85%.
Which year Volvo XC70 has the best MOT pass rate?
Of the years with at least 100 tests, the 2015 Volvo XC70 has the highest MOT pass rate at 85%, while the 2004 model has the lowest at 70%, a 15 point gap. Newer cars usually pass more often simply because they are younger, so compare years of a similar age.
Are newer Volvo XC70s more reliable?
Newer Volvo XC70s pass their MOT more often than older ones, by 9 percentage points on average, which is mostly down to age and wear.
Volvo XC70 Guides & Articles
Petrol vs Diesel in 2026: Which Actually Costs Less to Own?
8 min read
Running CostsCheapest Cars to Run in 2026: Running Costs From DVSA MOT Data
9 min read
Running CostsCheapest Cars to Insure in the UK: Insurance Groups 1-10
9 min read
Buying GuideFord Fiesta Common Problems (2026): What to Check Before Buying
13 min read
ReliabilityFord Puma Common Problems: 7 Issues That Could Cost £1,500+ (2026)
13 min read
Checking a specific Volvo XC70?
Enter the reg plate to see its individual MOT history, mileage verification, and predicted costs.