Kia Niro vs Toyota C-hr: Which is Better? (2026)
Side-by-side comparison of the Kia Niro and Toyota C-hr, covering MOT pass rates, running costs, common faults, and overall reliability. Based on 219,845 real MOT tests.
Quick Verdict
The Toyota C-hr comes out slightly ahead with a 92% MOT pass rate versus 91% for the Kia Niro. Both cars are competitive in this segment, but the Toyota C-hr has a small edge on reliability. Consider test driving both before making your decision.
Kia Niro
91%
MOT pass rate
79,691 tests
Toyota C-hr
92%
MOT pass rate
140,154 tests
More reliableFull Comparison: Kia Niro vs Toyota C-hr
| Category | Kia Niro | Toyota C-hr |
|---|---|---|
| MOT Pass Rate | 91% | 92%Winner |
| MOT Fail Rate | 9% | 8%Winner |
| vs National Avg | +9 pts | +10 ptsWinner |
| Est. Fuel Cost (8,000 mi/yr) | £913 | £913 |
| Insurance Group | 10-20 | 10-20 |
| Est. Depreciation/yr | £1,200-£2,200 | £1,200-£2,200 |
| Engine Size | 1.6L | 1.7L |
| Fuel Type(s) | Hybrid | Hybrid, Petrol |
| Segment | Small family car | Family car |
| Avg Mileage | 49,402 mi | 37,481 miWinner |
| MOT Tests Analysed | 79,691 | 140,154 |
| Model Years | 7 years | 8 years |
| Best Year | 2020 (93%) | 2022 (97%)Winner |
| Worst Year | 2017 (88%) | 2023 (88%) |
| Reliability Trend | Stable | Stable |
Common Problems Comparison
Kia Niro Known Issues
- •Suspension wear on older models
- •Lighting defects (common on all cars)
Toyota C-hr Known Issues
- •Suspension wear on older models
- •Lighting defects (common on all cars)
Check a Specific Kia Niro
Enter a reg plate to see the exact MOT history and running costs for a specific Kia Niro.
Check a Specific Toyota C-hr
Enter a reg plate to see the exact MOT history and running costs for a specific Toyota C-hr.
Save Money on Your Kia Niro
Exclusive deals and services picked for your Kia Niro
Compare car insurance
Could save you £200+ on insurance
Get quotes from top UK insurers in minutes
Compare quotes →Compare prices in 60 seconds
🚗Breakdown cover
Cover from under £4/month
RAC, AA, and Green Flag deals compared
Compare cover →Instant online quotes
✅Extended warranty
Plans from £15/month
Protect against unexpected repair bills
Get a quote →Cover starts immediately
🔧Book an MOT
Save up to 50% vs dealerships
Find the cheapest MOT near you
Find garages →Book online in minutes
Kia Niro vs Toyota C-hr FAQ
Which is more reliable, the Kia Niro or Toyota C-hr?
Based on MOT data, the Toyota C-hr is more reliable with a 92% pass rate, compared to 91% for the Kia Niro.
Which is cheaper to run?
At 8,000 miles per year, the Kia Niro costs around £913 in fuel, while the Toyota C-hr costs around £913. The Kia Niro is cheaper on fuel. Insurance, depreciation, and repair costs also factor into total running costs.
Should I buy a Kia Niro or Toyota C-hr?
The Toyota C-hr comes out slightly ahead with a 92% MOT pass rate versus 91% for the Kia Niro. Both cars are competitive in this segment, but the Toyota C-hr has a small edge on reliability. Consider test driving both before making your decision.
Kia Niro Running Costs
Full breakdown of annual costs, reliability, and MOT data
Toyota C-hr Running Costs
Full breakdown of annual costs, reliability, and MOT data
Compare Different Cars
Want to compare different cars? Enter any two reg plates for a personalised side-by-side comparison.
Compare Any Two Cars