Ford Puma vs Nissan Juke: Which is Better? (2026)
Side-by-side comparison of the Ford Puma and Nissan Juke, covering MOT pass rates, running costs, common faults, and overall reliability. Based on 506,356 real MOT tests.
Quick Verdict
The Nissan Juke comes out slightly ahead with a 79% MOT pass rate versus 74% for the Ford Puma. Both cars are competitive in this segment, but the Nissan Juke has a small edge on reliability. Consider test driving both before making your decision.
Ford Puma
74%
MOT pass rate
5,363 tests
Nissan Juke
79%
MOT pass rate
500,993 tests
More reliableFull Comparison: Ford Puma vs Nissan Juke
| Category | Ford Puma | Nissan Juke |
|---|---|---|
| MOT Pass Rate | 74% | 79%Winner |
| MOT Fail Rate | 26% | 21%Winner |
| vs National Avg | -8 pts | -3 ptsWinner |
| Est. Fuel Cost (8,000 mi/yr) | £913Winner | £1,195 |
| Insurance Group | 10-20 | 10-20 |
| Est. Depreciation/yr | £1,200-£2,200 | £1,200-£2,200 |
| Engine Size | 1.5L | 1.4L |
| Fuel Type(s) | Hybrid, Petrol | Petrol, Diesel |
| Segment | Small family car | Small family car |
| Avg Mileage | 57,633 miWinner | 60,563 mi |
| MOT Tests Analysed | 5,363 | 500,993 |
| Model Years | 9 years | 12 years |
| Best Year | 2021 (95%)Winner | 2021 (93%) |
| Worst Year | 1998 (68%) | 2010 (71%)Winner |
| Reliability Trend | Improving | Improving |
Common Problems Comparison
Ford Puma Known Issues
- •Suspension wear on older models
- •Lighting defects (common on all cars)
Nissan Juke Known Issues
- •DPF and emissions issues (diesel models)
- •Suspension wear on older models
- •Lighting defects (common on all cars)
Check a Specific Ford Puma
Enter a reg plate to see the exact MOT history and running costs for a specific Ford Puma.
Check a Specific Nissan Juke
Enter a reg plate to see the exact MOT history and running costs for a specific Nissan Juke.
Save Money on Your Ford Puma
Exclusive deals and services picked for your Ford Puma
Compare car insurance
Could save you £200+ on insurance
Get quotes from top UK insurers in minutes
Compare quotes →Compare prices in 60 seconds
🚗Breakdown cover
Cover from under £4/month
RAC, AA, and Green Flag deals compared
Compare cover →Instant online quotes
✅Extended warranty
Plans from £15/month
Protect against unexpected repair bills
Get a quote →Cover starts immediately
🔧Book an MOT
Save up to 50% vs dealerships
Find the cheapest MOT near you
Find garages →Book online in minutes
Ford Puma vs Nissan Juke FAQ
Which is more reliable, the Ford Puma or Nissan Juke?
Based on MOT data, the Nissan Juke is more reliable with a 79% pass rate, compared to 74% for the Ford Puma.
Which is cheaper to run?
At 8,000 miles per year, the Ford Puma costs around £913 in fuel, while the Nissan Juke costs around £1,195. The Ford Puma is cheaper on fuel. Insurance, depreciation, and repair costs also factor into total running costs.
Should I buy a Ford Puma or Nissan Juke?
The Nissan Juke comes out slightly ahead with a 79% MOT pass rate versus 74% for the Ford Puma. Both cars are competitive in this segment, but the Nissan Juke has a small edge on reliability. Consider test driving both before making your decision.
Ford Puma Running Costs
Full breakdown of annual costs, reliability, and MOT data
Nissan Juke Running Costs
Full breakdown of annual costs, reliability, and MOT data
Related Comparisons
Other popular head-to-head comparisons
Compare Different Cars
Want to compare different cars? Enter any two reg plates for a personalised side-by-side comparison.
Compare Any Two Cars