CarCostCheck

Vauxhall Crossland vs Ford Puma: Which is Better? (2026)

Side-by-side comparison of the Vauxhall Crossland and Ford Puma, covering MOT pass rates, running costs, common faults, and overall reliability. Based on 63,256 real MOT tests.

Quick Verdict

The Vauxhall Crossland is the clear winner in this comparison, with a significantly higher MOT pass rate of 88% compared to 74% for the Ford Puma. It is more likely to pass its MOT without issues and should cost less in unexpected repairs. If reliability is your top priority, the Vauxhall Crossland is the better choice.

Vauxhall Crossland

88%

MOT pass rate

57,893 tests

More reliable

Ford Puma

74%

MOT pass rate

5,363 tests

Full Comparison: Vauxhall Crossland vs Ford Puma

CategoryVauxhall CrosslandFord Puma
MOT Pass Rate88%Winner74%
MOT Fail Rate12%Winner26%
vs National Avg+6 ptsWinner-8 pts
Est. Fuel Cost (8,000 mi/yr)£1,004£913Winner
Insurance Group6-1510-20
Est. Depreciation/yr£800-£1,500£1,200-£2,200
Engine Size1.2L1.5L
Fuel Type(s)PetrolHybrid, Petrol
SegmentCity carSmall family car
Avg Mileage34,954 miWinner57,633 mi
MOT Tests Analysed57,8935,363
Model Years5 years9 years
Best Year2021 (94%)2021 (95%)Winner
Worst Year2017 (84%)Winner1998 (68%)
Reliability TrendImprovingImproving

Common Problems Comparison

Vauxhall Crossland Known Issues

  • Suspension wear on older models
  • Lighting defects (common on all cars)
Full Vauxhall Crossland common problems guide

Ford Puma Known Issues

  • Suspension wear on older models
  • Lighting defects (common on all cars)
Full Ford Puma common problems guide

Check a Specific Vauxhall Crossland

Enter a reg plate to see the exact MOT history and running costs for a specific Vauxhall Crossland.

GB

Free instant check using official DVSA and DVLA data

Check a Specific Ford Puma

Enter a reg plate to see the exact MOT history and running costs for a specific Ford Puma.

GB

Free instant check using official DVSA and DVLA data

Vauxhall Crossland vs Ford Puma FAQ

Which is more reliable, the Vauxhall Crossland or Ford Puma?

Based on MOT data, the Vauxhall Crossland is more reliable with a 88% pass rate, compared to 74% for the Ford Puma.

Which is cheaper to run?

At 8,000 miles per year, the Vauxhall Crossland costs around £1,004 in fuel, while the Ford Puma costs around £913. The Ford Puma is cheaper on fuel. Insurance, depreciation, and repair costs also factor into total running costs.

Should I buy a Vauxhall Crossland or Ford Puma?

The Vauxhall Crossland is the clear winner in this comparison, with a significantly higher MOT pass rate of 88% compared to 74% for the Ford Puma. It is more likely to pass its MOT without issues and should cost less in unexpected repairs. If reliability is your top priority, the Vauxhall Crossland is the better choice.

Related Comparisons

Other popular head-to-head comparisons

Compare Different Cars

Want to compare different cars? Enter any two reg plates for a personalised side-by-side comparison.

Compare Any Two Cars
GB